| Форумы
ЧАТ |
Орешник |
|
| Форумы -» | Основная («Начинающим»)/ Базы / WinAPI / Компоненты / Сети / Media / Игры / Corba и COM / KOL / FreePascal / .Net / Прочее / RSDN.ORG |
|
| ||
|
|
Новости |
Поиск |
FAQ |
Статьи |
Книги |
Новости VCL
| | Форумы ЧАТ |
Орешник |
|
| |||
| |||
| |||
« предыдущая ветвь | форум | следующая ветвь »
windows.pas for FPC needs to change names
Lars © (2005-06-10 16:48:00)I have had so many conflicts with windows.pas shipped with freepascal.. I've renamed mine to kolwindows.pas but maybe it should be named fpckolwindows.pas
The problem is that some units I use rely on the windows.pas for freepascal, and some rely on the windows.pas for kol.
I've made patches to Thaddy's windows.pas for fpc/kol so that now it works named as kolwindows.pas.
What do you think it should be named?
Lars (2005-06-11 06:32:00) [1]Oh, so is there a JCL windows.pas unit that I should be using? Does it offer the same code size.. i.e. no big initializations etc.?
Is it called windows.pas or jclwindows.pas.. ;)
I'll check your website because I think I saw something on JCL there before.
Can you give any disadvantages with renaming the units differently? I.e. what are the disadvantages that I am missing here with kolfpcwindows vs windows.pas? I see how system.pas should remain system.pas, because you want to drop system.pas in it's place. But when do we ever want to drop windows.pas in place or windows.pas?
Thaddy (2005-06-10 18:38:00) [2]windows.pas
I refer to my explanation before: If the JCL winapi is used you have to rename some things anyway and this is the way to go for VCL, FPC and KOL code alike. This is not a compiler issue, but a difference in opinion on how to translate the headers. The "correct" ones are for now the JCL ones.
And never mix code between the libraries.
| |
