| Форумы
ЧАТ |
Орешник |
|
| Форумы -» | Основная («Начинающим»)/ Базы / WinAPI / Компоненты / Сети / Media / Игры / Corba и COM / KOL / FreePascal / .Net / Прочее / RSDN.ORG |
|
| ||
|
|
Новости |
Поиск |
FAQ |
Статьи |
Книги |
Новости VCL
| | Форумы ЧАТ |
Орешник |
|
| |||
| |||
| |||
« предыдущая ветвь | форум | следующая ветвь »
KOL в LINUX [Delphi, Windows]
KreZ0n © (2003-08-17 10:38:00)Скажите, будут ли программы написанные на KOL работать в LINUX?
Boguslaw (2003-08-30 19:28:00) [1]Well,I investigate possibilities and seems there are some related to GPL source of Dev C++ (Yes ! it's not a mistake)
This project is related to MinGW and GCC but after modifications could stand as very good IDE even related to Delphi IDE with support od debugging with pasgdb.
I try to made it Delphi 5 compatible becouse I don't have Delphi 6 but if someone has and want to try to compile original source would be great to saw what You think .
If it is possible then also possible is to write similiar support to register controls in IDE.
Gandalf (2003-08-29 16:40:00) [2]What do you mean under KOL Studio?
Насчет сведения - нет проблемм, я так понимаю надо выбрать набор контролов и бибилиотек, которые надо включить в один пакет.
Mustafa_Kalashnikov (2003-08-29 10:59:00) [3]а не свести бы вам все библиотеки в одну и не обозвать бы ее KOLStudio? ;-)
SPeller (2003-08-29 03:51:00) [4]
> Boguslaw (29.08.03 01:12) [4]
Какая идея? :)
Boguslaw (2003-08-29 01:12:00) [5]Great. Maybe also KOL Studio ? I have one idea .... ;-)
Gandalf (2003-08-28 18:17:00) [6]But it's possible - now I'm looking on Kylix and CLX, how Borland do this... May be find good decision for this task.
Boguslaw (2003-08-26 21:44:00) [7]For this enterprise someone is needed with very good knowledge in KOL ,Delphi, WinAPI and also GTK+,Linux,Free Pascal
Cool ;-)
The problem is to make uniform API for both Windows and Linux opaque KOL or rewrite KOL to be uniform API
Gandalf (2003-08-23 15:37:00) [8]KOL только WinAPI держит (пока) хотя компилируется и на FPS (в Class версии). Потому - нет.
| |
